Thinking about corruption in all its Machiavellian glory is overwhelming. Drag this diagram of The Swamp ecosystem to your desktop and magnify. This is what POT 45 and the Patriots are trying to bring to an end. While the details in this chart may not be completely accurate or totally proven, we’re betting it’s probably not far off.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
Last week, former lead FBI lawyer, James Baker, reportedly told investigators that there was another source feeding information to the FBI before the agency launched an investigation into the Trump campaign. That means before there was a FISA warrant.
The source has been identified as Perkins Coie attorney Michael Ssmann, a former DOJ prosecutor and a top lawyer with the Democratic National Committee and the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign.
In the words of Devin Nunes:
“When Rosenstein appointed the special counsel, the lead investigators knew there was no evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Rsians. So what has the special counsel been doing this whole time?… It’s pretty clear now that [it’s] an investigation in search a crime.?Becae the same thing that the Trump campaign was investigated for, colluding with Rsians, we now know that it was the Democratic Party colluding with Rsians and feeding it to the top levels of the FBI, the general counsel of the FBI.”
Jt to be clear, that top FBI counsel was Mr. Baker, who reported directly to James Comey.
(Thank you, Maria Bartiromo)
Up next this week: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein meets in a closed-door session with Hoe investigators to explain the recent New York Times bombshell. According to sources in the Andrew McCabe camp, Mr. Rosenstein wanted to wear a wire and secretly record President Trump to gain information that would lead to his removal via the 25th Amendment.
Um, what country do we live in?
Regardless of your political persuasion, you mt be feeling a little queasy at this moment. These unprecedented activities, if proven to be true, completely undermine the Rule of Law and the democratic process. President Trump now has no choice but to declassify those documents that will shed further light on the true nature and depth of this unfolding investigation.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
#Qanon?? #WWG1WGA?? #TheStorm?? #WRWY
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
By Sundance at The Conservative Treehoe, 5 October 2018 ?
If you thought it was sketchy that Ms. Christine Blasey-Ford’s life-long best friend was a recently retired FBI agent and DOJ official, Monica McLean {Go Deep}; and if you thought it was sketchy that McLean and Ford were together on July 30th when Ford was writing a? letter to Dianne Feinstein, likely making the friend Ms Ford’s “handler” for the operation against Kavanaugh; then it’s even more sketchy today with a report that McLean was pressuring witness Leland Keyser to shape her statements and testimony to the FBI.
According to the Wall Street Journal the FBI has text messages from Ms. McLean to witness Ms. Keyser, directing her to modify statements more favorable to Ms. Ford.
WASHINGTON – A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford’s allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn’t corroborate Dr. Ford’s account, according to people familiar with the matter.
Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.
[…] On Thursday, a day after sending to the White Hoe the report on its investigation into the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, the FBI sent the White Hoe and Senate an additional package of information that included text messages from Ms. McLean to Ms. Keyser, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Oh, and McLean’s attorney is…. wait for it,….. David Laufman.
Ms. McLean’s lawyer, David Laufman, said in a statement: “Any notion or claim that Ms. McLean pressured Leland Keyser to alter Ms. Keyser’s account of what she recalled concerning the alleged incident between Dr. Ford and Brett Kavanaugh is absolutely false.”? (continue reading)
If there was any doubt the “small group” of connected DOJ and FBI officials were behind the e of Ms. Ford, you can put that doubt away now that Ms. Ford’s handler, Monica McLean, has enlisted David Laufman as her legal defense.
They’re not even trying to hide it any more. [READ MORE]
#InvestigateFeinstein
Eye of Vigilance
#QANON ?? #WWG1WGA
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
September was National Preparedness Month. Most of you understand what that means with hurricanes rolling through this time of year.
For those that somehow missed it, a different Storm of unprecedented proportions is brewing and will likely make landfall soon. Should it be named, it will be called Jtice.
It could strike jt about anywhere across these United States and around the globe. And in many places at once. The response to The Storm will be uncertain.
The only certainty is that an unprecedented enemy of the American Republic, foreign and domestic, will do what it can to avoid this reckoning and a return to Constitutional Rule of Law.
By any means necessary.
My family and close friends have been preparing a long time for this. And yet I found this video a measured yet stark reminder of what we may be facing in the coming weeks.
If you’ve been paying attention, you know this is not another internet episode of doom porn. Listen up and buckle up. Get yourselves squared away.
Stay strong. Stay together. God Bless.
#WWG1WGA
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
By John Solomon for The Hill, 3 October 2018 ?
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Rsia collion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.
James Baker
Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.
That’s the firm ed by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firm?Fion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election.
The dossier, though mostly unverified, was then ed by the FBI as the main evidence seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the campaign.
The revelation was confirmed both in contemporaneo evidence and testimony secured by a joint investigation by Republicans on the Hoe Judiciary and Government Oversight committees. [READ MORE]
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
There was something that jt didn’t feel right during the Dr. Christine Blasey Ford testimony. Perhaps it was the overly-prepared written statement that seemed to go out of its way to hit all the touch points commonly associated with textbook traumatic experience. The pseudo-legal mechanical accounting of the allegation felt contrived.
Maybe it was the melodramatic reading of the statement that made it all sound like a cheap summer beach novel. It wasn’t that the performance was clearly rehearsed. Of course it was, who doesn’t practice a speech? But it came across as telltale manipulation. Distinctly disingenuo.
Or maybe it was all the excruciating details surrounding her alleged torment, and yet queries regarding other details of the night in question elicited bumbling blank stares. Is that how emotional trauma works?
Finally, there were what can only be described as halting shifts in her personality. Shy little girl one moment, strong and defiant woman the next, followed by full-on zombie.
At odd moments throughout, Dr. Ford gulped air like a goldfish that jumped the bowl. God only knows how traumatic it would be for anyone to be under a spotlight of this magnitude, but the woman seemed possessed.
Like MK Ultra possessed.
And then, jt when you thought this political circ couldn’t get any more bizarre.
There’s apparently much more to Dr. Ford’s past than was revealed in front of the Senate microphone. Some extremely disturbing details are emerging from accessible open-source material, although it’s quickly being scrubbed.
If true, it is absolutely mind blowing, even to those who had immediately smelled a set-up. What’s truly striking in this report is that it begins to resemble the deep state machination of the corrupt marathon Mueller-Rsia probe.
Like the hapless goldfish, the longer it lays around exposed to sunlight, the more it starts to stink.
From the Millennium Report, 28 September 2018, original article by Paul Revere.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
Pick up your pens, fire up your platforms, and deploy your press freedoms. With truth, jtice, and honor. 
#InternetBillOfRights?? #WWG1WGA
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
The Free Press isn’t dead. It’s jt rarely found in mainstream outlets anymore. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, courtesy of Bill Clinton, unleashed a wave of media company mergers, effectively creating a monopoly.
For the moment, control of national broadcast and print journalism is firmly in the hands of self-serving corporate interests, in concert with rogue elements of government (read: global deep state). Today’s mainstream media is now the mockingbird media. What ed to be fact-based news is now politicized narrative. And that, dear countrymen, is a very dangero thing.
The “social” platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Google’s YouTube et al) are no better, given their manipulative algorithms and access to your personal data. Even worse, their recent spate of censoring opposition voices is the next step to marching the People off the cliff of oppression.
For your consideration and critical thinking, EoV has generated a list of alternative news sources that we have found insightful and informative. From essayists to bloggers, citizen journalists to full-time independent reporters, this is part of the New Fourth Estate that has emerged over these past decades. (These links will be hoed in the navigation at top.)
Varied in style and foc, what they share in common is a dogged determination to expose endemic corruption. They are all partisans for Liberty, of which can only exist when People have access to Truth. This is the core intent of the First Amendment’s guarantee of press freedom.
This resource list is by no means complete and will be subject to editing. You may not agree with everything you read.? Hopefully you won’t. But ask yourself why. And then answer with all the honesty you can mter.
A final note about the dreaded “Conspiracy Theory.” Do not be so quick to dismiss. This is a term coined long ago by the CIA (the architects of Operation Mockingbird) to demean and defame anyone who got too close to the truth, whether a witness or reporter.
And yet when you unpack this pejorative label, you’ll find that a conspiracy is simply two or more people engaged in an immoral and/or criminal plot. The Swamp is full of them. And a theorist, by definition, is a thinker, a truth-seeker.
This perfectly describes the investigative journalist, once regarded as the ultimate badge of honor to which every journalism student aspired. And in some remote, principled corners of the world wide web, still does.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
This is not a myth. The CIA has openly admitted to planting agents in newsrooms to influence the information that Americans have long taken for granted as unbiased journalism. It was easy.
Feeding biased, misleading, and flat out false narratives to the American public is even easier now with a small handful of national media corporations controlling the flow of content. Even the new media platforms have gotten into the act.
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have begun a politicized censorship campaign by spending “conservative” accounts for vague violations of their er agreements. It’s no coincidence that this is occurring during the run-up to the midterm elections. Even Democrat voters recognize the bias
Given that these social platforms are private binesses, it’s not a First Amendment issue. But it is discrimination. To wit: if a privately-owned bakery can be sued for refing to bake a gay wedding cake due to religio beliefs, how then can a privately-owned social platform refe service based on political beliefs?
Maybe the baker needs a “er agreement.” Maybe we all need an Internet Bill of Rights.
You see where this is going. Widespread control of information and shutting down any information that runs counter. All for the purpose of influencing elections and steering foreign policy (read: starting wars for profit and global hegemony).
Should this trend become irreversible, your precio democracy is dead, and the American Republic goes the way of Iraq or Venezuela, banana republics all. We are on the cp.
? #MockingbirdMedia? #FakeNews? #InternetBillOfRights
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
By Max Bitterklinger, September 23, 2018 ?
The flag emblems above should concern any American, regardless of your political party, assuming you still believe in political parties. The logo on the left is the paramilitary wing of the Communist Party in Germany (circa 1933). The one on the right (circa 2017) belongs to ANTIFA, the paramilitary wing of today’s Democrat Party (read: progressive Democrat Socialists). You can see the actual flags below.
If you’re a student of history, it’s all you need to know about who’s on the streets today bloodying Trump supporters across this country, violently disrupting right-of-center assemblies, denying free speech to conservative speakers. Evidence even suggests that the so-called Alt Right was a set-up to lure unspecting defenders of Free Speech and brandish them as racist.
Who can doubt it? This is the By Any Means Necessary crowd. These modern jackbooted thugs are cut from the exact same cloth as their 20th-century Communist forbears, right down to the violent and intimidating fascist tactics. Think about that. Communist fascists in anti-fascist clothing. Nuff said. At least it should be.
For anyone interested, I’m going to continue below into the finer points of American freedom, as I have witnessed and experienced them. And understand them according to rule of law.
AS A KID growing up, I was taught that everyone had a right to express their own views in America. You could march down Main Street carrying your own banner or your own particular flag. That “right” extended to everybody and anybody. From Neo Nazis to American Communists, from Black Panthers to Ku Klux Klanners in white sheets.
Like? it or not, this was America and that was freedom. Through my childish eyes, I remember thinking this was actually a smart idea. Better to see scary people on parade in broad daylight, than knowing they were out there hiding in the dark. There were no hate speech laws. No safe spaces to protect my little ears.
LATER IN COLLEGE this “free expression”could be found in the curriculum, especially on liberal campes like the one I attended. Political science and sociology classes introduced (read: indoctrinated) students to the theories of Marx and Mao and alternative forms of governance. All under the guise of questioning government, which I still believe is a good thing in principle.
AS AN ADULT my understanding of free expression sharpened with further study of the federal and state constitutions. The Founders specifically created the First Amendment? to make sure We The People had a way to peacefully protest (read: non-violent demonstration) any transgressions committed by government officials.
You can get together with friends and neighbors (the right to peaceably assembly); discs your concerns (right to free speech); and publish your opinions and criticisms of government actions (right to a free press). You can even even write a petition demanding that the government change any policy that violates the Constitution (right to petition).
All without fear of being thrown in prison. These are constitutional guarantees of? natural rights. That means government didn’t give them to you, so government can’t take them away. Makes perfect sense.
THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOESN’T MEAN that you can say anything you want without consequence. Jt as surely as you can’t enter? my hoe and insult my wife, for example, without the possibility of getting punched in the nose and tossed out on your ass.
It doesn’t mean you can write and publish anything you want about private citizens. That’s why we have libel and slander laws. You see, with freedom comes responsibility and accountability. Fair enough.
There are also laws that forbid beating up folks for their political views. And rioting. And destroying private or public property becae…becae everyone’s a fascist that doesn’t believe in your communist/socialist/progressive views. Jt as surely as their are laws for physically harming people for their skin color or ethnicity or religio beliefs or sexual preference.
Jt as surely as their are laws laws against cops kicking down doors and shooting unarmed citizens. And spying on private citizens. And ing national defense intelligence agencies and tools to influence elections.
DARK TO LIGHT: Let the light burn brightly on these cockroaches. All of them. It’s not jt about the political left and political right. It’s about right vers wrong. It’s about whether we have the strength to keep a republican (read: representative) form of government, as duly elected by a democratic process. It’s about whether we have the stomach to support and defend constitutional rule of law.
Here’s a gallery of images. No photoshop.
Sunday, Augt 27, 2017, Berkeley, California
And don’t miss this stylish little Anarcho Communist (Ancom) fashion accessory from the local Antifa United store. (But wait, isn’t that capitalism?)
# # #
Since the American Revolutionary War, tens of millions of men and women have sworn an Oath of Allegiance to support and defend the Constitution and laws of these United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
These oaths are not reserved for presidents and military personnel. Elected representatives at all levels of government swear an oath, as do many non-governmental civilians.? So do immigrants aspiring to U.S. citizenship. These oaths do not expire.
And this is why it is important:
Our unique American Constitution is called the Supreme Law of the Land for a reason. The Founders went to great lengths to ensure that the power of the federal government could not be urped and abed by tyrannical interests against the People.
The Constitution is the rule book by which the federal government was intended to operate. It set limits on what government can do. It was a system to hold government officials accountable.
The separate executive, legislative, and judicial branches are part of the independent checks and balances. The States and their legislatures also played a role. But in the end, the Constitution can only have meaning if the People support and defend it.
Over time many elected and appointed officials within our governments have trampled Americans’ rights and freedoms without consequence. Corporations have been wholly complicit in this slow-motion coup d’etat. A politicized corporate media is jt one example. Data collection and monitoring inside the social platforms is another.
When government agencies are politicized (IRS, DOJ, FBI, CIA), we have no democracy. When there is no Rule of Law to defend against corrupt individuals in and out of government, we have no Republic. And then? The promise of America will be vanquished for a thoand years.
Very soon, Americans will learn the shocking extent of political and corporate corruption as it has existed over the decades. It will be ugly beyond belief, but you will at last have the ugly Truth.
What’s at stake: One last chance to set America on her proper course and fulfill her great potential.
Patriots take note and take heart.?It is our time. Be grateful we are on this earth to bear witness and take part in this fight on behalf of our children. Support and defend your Constitution in every way imaginable. Against all enemies foreign and domestic.
#WWG1WGA
# # #
By Elise Cooper?for American Thinker, July 4, 2018 ?
The Fourth of July celebrates America’s freedom from England.? The delegates from the thirteen colonies adopted the Declaration of Independence, the document written by Thomas Jefferson that?gave?America its moral pulse.? After the Continental Congress approved the final wording of the Declaration of Independence, the United States of America was born.
Thomas Jefferson
Americans need to be grateful to Jefferson for giving the language and values of liberty and freedom. Yet, by watching and listening to Lin-Manuel Miranda’s play “Hamilton” people will get the wrong impression of Hamilton and Jefferson.? As Hamilton’s star has risen, Jefferson’s has fallen. In looking at the political views and policies of each man there should be a recognition of who is the elitist and who is the one supporting the common individual.
Jefferson strove to make the American government everything that the British government was not. As historian Ron Chernow said in his book Alexander Hamilton, Hamilton’s Federalist Party was “elitist in its politics and tended to doubt the wisdom of the common people.” No one ever mentions that Hamilton believed that the President should have power for life, similar to the King of England.
Hamilton went so far as to call for a new Constitutional Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation.? His plan was to have a permanent president who would appoint all the governors and who would have veto power over all state legislation. Under such a plan, state sovereignty would have been destroyed, and there would have been no escape from the central government’s high taxes.
Murray Rothbard, who wrote The Mystery of Banking, said Hamilton wished to “reimpose in the new United States a system of mercantilism and big government similar to that in Great Britain, against which the colonists had rebelled. The object was to have a strong central government, particularly a strong president or king as chief executive, built up by high taxes and heavy public debt.”
Alexander Hamilton
Chernow goes on to say, “Jeffersonians called themselves Republicans, believing in limited federal power, a dominant Congress, and states’ rights who credited the wisdom of the common people.” In other words, he was an anti-Monarchist.? Historian John Boles, who wrote Jefferson: Architect of Liberty, noted to American Thinker, “Jefferson was not opposed to strong government as long as it stayed within it Constitutional bounds. He believed in political power from the people.”
Hamilton’s autocratic notions vers Jefferson’s beliefs can be viewed with their attitude toward a central bank.? Granted, Hamilton was correct in recognizing that the U.S. economy was a total mess. The Revolutionary War had left a huge debt with no plans on how it would be paid off.? Some states simply repudiated the debt, making it more difficult for other states to borrow money and rebuild their economies. Yet, Jefferson complained that the bank created a national banking elite and gave them extraordinary power and wealth at the expense of ordinary citizens of the country.
Rothbard stated, the “Bank of North America was deliberately modeled after the Bank of England. The Bank was given a monopoly privilege of its notes being receivable in all tax payments to state and federal government, and no other banks were permitted to operate in the country. It gracioly agreed to lend most of its newly created money to the federal government, while the hapless taxpayers would have to pay the Bank principal and interest.”
Becae the bank would have unprecedented control over the economy it would also have leverage over the government.? Jefferson believed this would render U.S. commercial policy hostage to Britain.? He warned that this policy concentrated powers in the hands of a small number of wealthy men in only one section of the country.? This British domination of American trade harmed this nation’s economy and crippled small local indtries.? Boles noted that even a fellow Federalist, President John Adams, became more and more convinced that Hamilton was the largest threat to the constitutional form of government, someone with Napoleonic ambitions.
Those who enjoyed the Hamilton play should remember that it has a fictional element to it. In reality Hamilton wanted an Aristocratic America, and that is was Jefferson who was protective of individual rights. This July Fourth people should refer back to history, not revisionist history, to understand the beliefs of Alexander Hamilton vers Thomas Jefferson.
The author writes for American Thinker.? She has done book reviews, author interviews, and has written a number of national security, political, and foreign policy articles.
EoV Note: Read other Independence Day postings at American Thinker.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
PRAY.
BE STRONG.
STAY TOGETHER.
THAN ALL THAT THE FORCES OF DARKNESS MAY MTER.
REMAIN VIGILANT.
INDEPENDENCE.
WWG1WGA.
FREEDOM.
AMEN.
#InternetBillofRights?#PatriotsFight?#OIGReport?#QAnon?#Q #WWG1WGA
This Day in History: Senator Joseph McCarthy charges that communists have infiltrated the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the atomic weapons indtry. Although McCarthy’s accations created a momentary controversy, they were quickly dismissed as mere sensationalism from a man whose career was rapidly slipping away.
Enter John Owen Brennan, fifth Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. According to Mr. Brennan, he cast his vote in the 1976 presidential election for G Hall, the Communist Party A candidate. This was during the Cold War, which would “officially” end with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Perhaps the CIA believed that young John Brennan, (age twenty-one in 1976), was simply a youthful, left-leaning idealist when he cast that vote for Communism. Perhaps they thought his interest could be exploited for agency gain.
Whatever The Company’s rationale, this fact remains: not only did a communist political supporter gain access to the CIA, but eventually made it to the top slot (after converting to Islam) during the presidential tenure of one Barack Hsein Obama. Of course, this is hardly surprising given POT 44’s ties to radical Marxists and communists his entire life, and his expressed political affinity for Mlims. Birds of a feather?
It jt may be, however, that Mr. Brennan’s communist chickens have come home to roost. Made possible by an arrogant coup attempt that ed classic projection to acce Donald Trump of what those involved had actually done to destroy Trump’s candidacy and presidency: collion with an evil Rsia bent on undermining American democracy. That’s some kind of irony.
Somewhere, Joe McCarthy is laughing his tail gunner off.
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
By Lee Smith for Real Clear Investigations, May 30, 2018 ?
While most media accounts have simply repeated official claims that Mifsud is a sketchy character whose visits to Rsia and academic contacts suggest he is working for Rsian intelligence, a look at the available evidence challenges that narrative. It also raises the possibility that Mifsud, whose circles are tied to the Clintons, may, like another professor recently in the news, Stefan Halper, have actually been working for Western intelligence agencies.
By George Neumayr for The American Spectator, May 22, 2018 ?
The members of Brennan’s working group at Langley “were jt a bunch of out-of-control idiots,” says a former high-ranking CIA official to?TAS. He finds it flabbergasting that Brennan would bring CIA officials and FBI officials into the same room to cook up schemes to send a spy into the Trump campaign’s ranks. One of those schemes involved money (Halper paid George Papadopoulos $3,000 for a phony research paper as a way of luring him into a London meeting); another involved sex (Halper’s assistant, with a name out of a bad spy novel, Azra Turk, tried to coax information from Papadopoulos at flirty bar outings, according to the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross).
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
By Freeman, May 28, 2018 ?
It will serve our national conscioness this Memorial Day to consider the sacrifices made by generation upon generation of American service men and women. Those who have selflessly performed their duty whenever and wherever called, fighting and dying on battlefields around the globe.
Q: What did they die for?
This is not a question of the merits of any particular conflict or even War in general. Those armchair debates are the domain of keyboard commandos and the safe harbor of university and online salons. Real warriors have no such luxury.
Indeed, America’s guards, soldiers, pilots, sailors and marines willingly pay the ultimate price for their brothers and sisters in arms. They sacrifice to preserve a way of life for their families and communities back home.
They die in the line of Duty.
For the American Warrior, there is only a question of honoring one’s Oath to protect and defend the Constitution for the United States. In real terms, this means the Constitutional Republic, secured through a Democratic process and held in check by Rule of Law.
It is through the lens of Honor that we should remember their sacrifice. It is also the backdrop against which we should view the ongoing coup against the duly elected POT. Bear in mind that those central to this affair also took an Oath: Hillary Clinton, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Loretta Lynch, Valerie Jarrett, and yes, Barack Obama.
Oaths do not expire. Yet for some, morality does.
This Memorial Day, remember that our fallen American Warriors did not forego their lives so those entrted to governance could execute a self-serving agenda, kept secret from the American People.
Above all, they did not die so that Oath breakers could illegally exploit military intelligence assets to undermine American democracy in a national election, perhaps the most sacred privilege of United States citizenship and a fundamental necessity of self-government.
Now is the time to do your Civic Duty and demand jtice on behalf of those who so nobly served on behalf of our country.
Have a safe Memorial Day.
#SALUTE
# # #
Eye of Vigilance
Eye of Vigilance